The University of Auckland has reclaimed its position at the pinnacle of international dispute resolution, securing first place at the 21st edition of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Commercial Mediation Competition. In a high-stakes final held in Paris, the New Zealand-based team demonstrated superior negotiation and communication skills to defeat Germany’s Bucerius Law School. The victory marks a significant return to form for Auckland, a university that has historically dominated this prestigious event, and underscores the growing importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in the global commercial landscape. Hosted from February 2 to February 7, the competition brought together 58 university teams from 34 countries, making it one of the largest and most diverse iterations in the event’s 21-year history.
Evolution of the ICC Commercial Mediation Competition
The 21st edition of the ICC Commercial Mediation Competition introduced several structural changes designed to enhance the competitive rigor and educational value of the event. For the first time, the field of competing teams was expanded from 48 to 58, reflecting an increasing global interest in mediation as a primary tool for resolving business conflicts. To accommodate this growth and ensure a higher standard of evaluation, the preliminary rounds saw an increase in the number of judges per session, moving from two to three.
Furthermore, the tournament bracket was adjusted to include an octo-final round, replacing the traditional quarter-final format. This change allowed more teams to experience the pressure of knockout-stage mediation, providing a broader platform for students to showcase their skills before professional practitioners. Despite these procedural updates, the venue for the final round remained the same: the historical Émile Boutmy Lecture Hall at Sciences Po University. This venue, steeped in academic and political history, provided a fittingly solemn and grand atmosphere for the resolution of the final mock dispute.
A Week of Intensive Negotiation: The Competition Chronology
The competition unfolded over six days of intensive sessions, beginning on February 2. The schedule was designed to simulate the fast-paced and often grueling nature of international commercial negotiations.
- Opening Days (February 2–4): The preliminary rounds saw 58 teams engage in over 95 mock mediation sessions. Each team was required to represent either a requesting or responding party in various complex commercial scenarios. These sessions were administered under the official ICC Mediation Rules, providing students with a practical understanding of the framework used in real-world international disputes.
- The Knockout Stages (February 5–6): Following the preliminaries, the top-performing teams advanced to the newly established octo-finals. Throughout these rounds, the complexity of the cases increased, requiring teams to pivot their strategies and address deeper underlying interests rather than just legal positions.
- The Grand Final (February 7): On Saturday morning, the University of Auckland and Bucerius Law School faced off in the Émile Boutmy Lecture Hall. The final problem, authored by renowned Hong Kong mediator Jody Sin, involved a complex joint venture dispute concerning multiple handbag brands. The session was mediated by Bill Wood, a distinguished mediator from London, who guided the parties through the final hurdles of their mock negotiation.
The Final Showdown: Auckland vs. Bucerius
The University of Auckland entered the final with a formidable reputation, having previously achieved a record-breaking streak of four consecutive wins between 2019 and 2022. The 2026 final was a symbolic rematch of the 2020 competition, where Auckland also faced Bucerius Law School.
Representing the University of Auckland on stage were Jumana Maash and Chloe Mills, acting as the requesting party. They were supported by a dedicated team including Samuel Foote and Benjamin Jones, alongside coaches Annabelle Kay and Ji Min Seo. The team’s performance was characterized by a sophisticated balance of empathy, commercial acumen, and procedural precision.
Reflecting on the victory, Chloe Mills emphasized that the win was the culmination of an exhausting but rewarding journey. She noted that the team approached the competition with a "mindset to learn," focusing not just on the mechanics of mediation but on personal and collective growth. The "long nights" and intensive preparation were cited as the foundation of their success, reinforcing the idea that successful mediation is as much about preparation as it is about live performance.
Bucerius Law School, represented by Maria Franziska Geisel and Anna Maria Amann, also received high praise for their performance. Anna Maria Amann remarked on the escalating difficulty of the cases throughout the week, noting that the final session was the most challenging. She highlighted the value of translating theoretical legal knowledge into practical, real-life experience—a core objective of the ICC’s educational initiatives.
Expert Evaluation and Professional Standards
The final round was presided over by a panel of five distinguished judges: Aneesha Bhunjun, Mary McLain, Alain Roy, Lela Porter Love, and Tat Lim. Their presence ensured that the competing students were held to the highest professional standards. Tat Lim, a prominent figure in the mediation community, lauded the "level of sophistication in the communication" displayed by both teams, describing the final as "exceptional."
This high level of communication is central to the ICC’s philosophy of mediation. Unlike litigation or arbitration, which often focus on "rights-based" outcomes (who is legally correct), mediation prioritizes "interest-based" outcomes. This requires students to look beyond the immediate legal conflict to find creative solutions that preserve commercial relationships and address the financial and emotional needs of the parties involved.
Official Commentary on the Future of Dispute Resolution
The competition trophy was presented by Alexander G. Fessas, Secretary General of the ICC International Court of Arbitration and Director of ICC Dispute Resolution Services. In his address, Fessas underscored the strategic importance of mediation in the modern economy. He highlighted that mediation is not merely a "softer" alternative to court but a "faster, fair, and efficient way of dispute resolution" that actively strengthens access to justice.
Fessas provided compelling data to support the ICC’s advocacy for mediation, noting that in more than 70% of mediation cases, parties reach a settlement for at least part of their dispute. This high success rate is a primary reason why the ICC continues to invest in global educational programs. By training the next generation of lawyers in these techniques, the ICC aims to shift the corporate culture toward more collaborative and less adversarial conflict resolution.
Statistical Context and Global Impact
The 21st ICC Commercial Mediation Competition arrives at a time when demand for ADR services is on the rise. In 2025, the ICC International Centre for ADR registered 36 formal requests for mediation under the ICC Mediation Rules. While this number represents the formal docket, it is indicative of a broader trend where multinational corporations are increasingly incorporating mediation clauses into their contracts.
The participation of 280 students and 120 professionals from 34 different countries in this year’s competition demonstrates the global reach of these standards. The diversity of the participants—ranging from common law jurisdictions like New Zealand to civil law systems like Germany—highlights the universal applicability of the ICC Mediation Rules.
Analysis: The Strategic Importance of Commercial Mediation
The success of the University of Auckland and the high performance of all participating teams reflect a significant shift in legal education and practice. As global supply chains become more complex and international joint ventures more common, the cost of protracted litigation has become prohibitive for many businesses. Mediation offers a confidential, cost-effective, and flexible alternative that allows companies to maintain control over the outcome of their disputes.
The mock problem used in the final—a joint venture involving luxury handbag brands—is a prime example of the type of dispute where mediation excels. In such cases, the value of the brands and the continuity of the partnership are often more important than the specific legal point of contention. The ability of the Auckland team to navigate these commercial nuances is what ultimately set them apart.
Furthermore, the inclusion of 120 professional mediators and judges as volunteers underscores the professional community’s commitment to mentorship. These experts provide students with real-time feedback that is rarely available in a traditional classroom setting, bridging the gap between academic theory and the realities of international business.
Conclusion and Future Outlook
The 21st ICC Commercial Mediation Competition has once again proven to be a vital forum for the development of international legal talent. The University of Auckland’s victory reinforces their status as a global leader in mediation training, while the overall growth of the competition signals a healthy future for the field of ADR.
As the ICC continues to advocate for mediation, the lessons learned by the 280 students in Paris will likely resonate throughout their future careers. By focusing on interest-based outcomes and sophisticated communication, these future practitioners are well-equipped to handle the complexities of the 21st-century global economy. The ICC remains committed to this mission, providing the rules, the platform, and the expertise necessary to ensure that mediation remains a cornerstone of international commercial dispute resolution. For those looking to revisit the event, recordings of the final session and highlights are available through the ICC’s official digital channels, serving as a permanent resource for aspiring mediators worldwide.
About the Author
