The modern global economy is no longer defined solely by the exchange of goods and services but by the capture and monetization of human focus, a phenomenon known as the "attention economy." In his latest work, The Sirens’ Call: How Attention Became the World’s Most Endangered Resource, MSNBC host Chris Hayes argues that human attention has become the defining commodity of the 21st century, mirroring the way labor was commodified during the early stages of industrial capitalism. Speaking in a recent interview for the second season of WIRED’s The Big Interview podcast, Hayes detailed the profound implications of this shift, ranging from the "contentization" of American foreign policy to the radicalization of Silicon Valley elites and the looming disruption of the global labor market by artificial intelligence.
The Historical Evolution of the Attention Merchant
The concept of selling an audience’s attention to third parties is not a product of the digital age, though its scale has reached unprecedented levels. Hayes traces the origins of this commodification back to two pivotal 19th-century developments: the commercial billboard and the "penny press." In the 1830s, publications like the New York Sun revolutionized media by selling newspapers for less than the cost of production. This loss-leader strategy was designed to aggregate a mass audience, which could then be sold to advertisers.
Historically, this required manual metrics, such as individuals with clickers counting passersby at billboard locations. Today, the process has been refined through high-frequency algorithmic auctions. "No media companies ever had billions of users before," Hayes noted, highlighting the shift from human programming choices to nanosecond-speed data processing. This evolution has transformed the media landscape into a "slot-machine" environment where every piece of content—from hard-hitting journalism to viral entertainment—competes in a singular, globalized arena.
Geopolitics as Content: The 21st-Century Imperialism
A significant portion of Hayes’ analysis focuses on how political actors, specifically the administration of Donald Trump, have adapted to this attention-driven landscape. Hayes posits that modern statecraft is increasingly performed as "content," intended to dominate news cycles rather than achieve traditional diplomatic or military objectives.
Using the early 2025 escalations in the Middle East as a backdrop, Hayes described the performance of military aggression as a genre of media. He argued that strikes on civilian vessels and international ousters are often produced with a "vertical video wrapper," designed to be consumed on social media platforms. "They perform aggression, war, imperialism, foreign policy, all as content," Hayes stated. This strategy serves a dual purpose: it satisfies the leader’s psychological need for central focus while leveraging 19th-century imperialist ambitions through 21st-century distribution channels.
The danger of this "war porn" approach, according to Hayes, is the erasure of human consequences. While the digital representation of conflict may look like a high-budget action film, the underlying reality involves significant loss of life and the destabilization of the constitutional order. For journalists, the challenge lies in covering these events without adopting the administration’s propagandistic terms or contributing to the "mind-numbing pace" of the news cycle that benefits the incumbent.
The 2024 Election and the Broken Theory of Political Attention
The intersection of attention and politics was perhaps most visible during the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. Data from the cycle suggests a widening divide between news consumers and those disengaged from traditional media. According to Hayes, voters who reported high levels of news consumption favored Vice President Kamala Harris by a significant margin. Conversely, President Trump’s support increased among voters who consumed little to no traditional journalism.
This shift indicates a collapse of the traditional "paid media" model, which relied on television advertising to reach the electorate. Hayes noted that the Democratic party has historically struggled to reach "low-information" or "zero-information" voters who have opted out of the traditional media ecosystem.
"You can’t just say, ‘We’re gonna raise a lot of money, and then we’re gonna run a lot of ads on the local news,’" Hayes observed. Instead, the 2024 cycle demonstrated the efficacy of "earned media" through non-traditional channels, such as long-form podcasts and viral social media stunts. While figures like State Representative James Talarico and Representative Jasmine Crockett have developed distinct "theories of attention" to build national profiles, the broader Democratic establishment is still grappling with how to galvanize an electorate that increasingly resides in fragmented, algorithmic silos.
The Ideological Realignment of Silicon Valley
The relationship between the federal government and the technology industry has undergone a radical transformation, moving from a "countercultural, utopian" spirit to an alliance of incumbents. Hayes observed that the presence of tech elites at presidential inaugurations signals a merging of corporate and state power that was previously unimaginable.
Hayes attributes this shift to several factors:
- Industry Maturity: As the tech sector transitioned from insurgent startups to dominant global corporations, its leadership’s politics drifted toward the right, seeking to protect accumulated capital.
- Labor Backlash: A growing resentment among tech leaders toward "woke" or activist employees has fueled a reactionary political turn.
- The AI Arms Race: The development of artificial intelligence has created an existential dependency on the state. Companies like OpenAI and Anthropic require massive amounts of capital and favorable regulatory environments to maintain their "treadmill" of growth.
A chilling example of this new dynamic occurred when the Pentagon expressed frustration over terms-of-service disagreements with Anthropic regarding the use of the "Claude" AI model. The subsequent "swooping in" by OpenAI to secure a government deal illustrates a landscape where ethical considerations may be sidelined by the financial burden of maintaining multi-billion-dollar AI infrastructures.
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labor
Perhaps the most pressing concern raised by Hayes is the potential for AI to cause "profound dislocation" in the labor market. While many on the political left have dismissed AI as "hype" or corporate propaganda, Hayes argues that the technology is "manifestly getting better" and will inevitably touch a wide range of professions, from software engineering to legal services and healthcare administration.
The "job replacement issue" presents a unique challenge for the left. Hayes suggests that resisting AI often feels like ceding to the narratives of Silicon Valley oligarchs. However, he emphasizes that a failure to take the technology’s capabilities seriously will leave workers unprotected. "We should be regulating AI," Hayes argued, calling for "first-principles thinking" about how a wealthy society should be ordered if human labor is no longer the primary driver of productivity.
He also pointed to "small acts of resistance" at the grassroots level, such as communities fighting the construction of data centers. These centers drive up local electricity prices and consumption while housing technology designed to shift the distribution of national income from labor to capital. For Hayes, these local battles are legitimate ways to operationalize public sentiment against an automated future.
Conclusion: A Call for Humane Technology
As the attention economy continues to evolve, Hayes remains critical of the tools currently dominating the landscape. In a concluding reflection on the state of communication technology, he called for a return to quality over quantity. He specifically criticized the degradation of cellular technology, noting that the lack of "side tone"—the ability to hear one’s own voice in a receiver—has fundamentally altered the intimacy and quality of human conversation.
The overarching theme of Hayes’ analysis is a warning: when attention becomes a commodity, the human element of society is at risk of being sidelined by the demands of the "always-on" content machine. Whether in the realm of global warfare, national elections, or the future of work, the challenge for the next decade will be reclaiming human focus from the sirens of the algorithmic age.
About the Author
