The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), representing a global network of over 45 million companies across 170 countries, has issued a decisive call to action at the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Speaking on behalf of the global business community, the ICC emphasized that the transition from high-level commitments to ground-level implementation is no longer optional but a fundamental economic necessity. As the Government of Armenia hosts this pivotal summit, the ICC’s intervention highlights a shifting paradigm where nature loss is increasingly recognized not merely as an environmental crisis, but as a material economic risk that threatens the stability of global supply chains and long-term value creation.
The ICC’s position underscores the urgent need for governments to provide clear policy signals and credible implementation pathways. For the private sector to mobilize at the scale required to meet the goals of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), the organization argues that national strategies must be both actionable and investable. This involves a comprehensive integration of business feedback into national biodiversity strategies, the standardization of nature-related metrics, and the creation of financial environments that de-risk private investment in nature-positive outcomes.
The Strategic Context of COP17 and the Road from Montreal
The convening of COP17 in Armenia serves as a critical milestone in the chronological progression of international biodiversity governance. The journey toward this summit began in earnest with the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework at COP15 in December 2022. That landmark agreement set 23 targets for 2030, including the "30 by 30" goal—protecting 30% of the world’s land and oceans. Following the groundwork laid at COP16, which focused on the initial alignment of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs), COP17 represents the phase of accountability and accelerated execution.
The selection of Armenia as the host nation for COP17 follows a competitive diplomatic process, signaling a broadening of the geographical leadership in biodiversity conservation. For the ICC, this conference is the venue where the "what" of biodiversity protection must finally be met with the "how" of economic integration. The timeline for achieving the 2030 targets is narrowing, and the ICC’s message reflects a growing impatience within the private sector for regulatory clarity that would allow businesses to align their operations with the "nature-positive" transition.
Nature Loss as a Material Economic Risk
Central to the ICC’s address is the assertion that nature loss is a material economic risk. This perspective is supported by a growing body of data from global financial institutions. According to the World Economic Forum, more than half of the world’s total GDP—approximately $44 trillion—is moderately or highly dependent on nature and its services. From pollination and water purification to carbon sequestration and soil fertility, the "ecosystem services" provided by the natural world underpin the profitability of sectors ranging from agriculture and pharmaceuticals to construction and energy.
As biodiversity declines at rates unprecedented in human history, the ICC warns that the resulting disruptions to supply chains and resource availability pose a systemic threat to global markets. By framing nature conservation as a risk management strategy, the ICC aims to bridge the gap between environmental advocacy and corporate fiduciary duty. The organization argues that without coherent policies, businesses face a "compliance vacuum" that hinders their ability to innovate and invest in sustainable practices.
National Implementation Plans and the Integration of Business Feedback
A primary demand from the ICC at COP17 is the inclusion of the private sector in the design and execution of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs). Traditionally, these plans have been the purview of environment ministries, often operating in isolation from economic and trade departments. The ICC argues that for biodiversity goals to be met, they must be mainstreamed across all government sectors and developed in consultation with the industries that will be responsible for implementing changes on the ground.
Practical guidance is needed in several key areas:
- Nature Metrics and Disclosures: Businesses require standardized frameworks to measure their impact on biodiversity. The ICC advocates for the adoption of metrics that align with the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), providing a common language for reporting and transparency.
- Nature-Positive Supply Chains: Companies are seeking clarity on how to transition their supply chains to minimize ecological footprints without compromising economic viability.
- Innovation and Technology: The ICC emphasizes that policy should encourage, rather than stifle, the development of new technologies that can help monitor biodiversity and reduce resource extraction.
Mobilizing Finance through De-risking and Market Integrity
The "finance gap" remains one of the most significant hurdles in the global biodiversity agenda. Estimates suggest that to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, the world needs to close a funding gap of roughly $700 billion per year. The ICC asserts that public funding alone will never be sufficient and that the mobilization of private capital is essential. However, private investment in nature is currently hampered by high perceived risks and a lack of clear returns.
To address this, the ICC urges COP17 delegates to focus on "de-risking" nature investments. This involves using public funds to provide guarantees, first-loss capital, or blended finance structures that make nature-based projects more attractive to institutional investors. Furthermore, the ICC highlights the need for "market integrity." This refers to the creation of robust, transparent markets for biodiversity credits and other nature-related financial instruments. By aligning financial incentives with measurable, nature-positive outcomes, governments can create a market environment where protecting a forest is more profitable than clearing it.
The Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism and Innovation
One of the most complex issues on the COP17 agenda is the development of a multilateral mechanism for benefit-sharing from the use of Digital Sequence Information (DSI) on genetic resources. This issue sits at the intersection of biodiversity, biotechnology, and international equity. For decades, the pharmaceutical, agricultural, and cosmetic industries have utilized genetic data from nature to develop new products. Under the CBD, there is a mandate that the benefits derived from these resources must be shared fairly with the countries of origin, which are often in the biodiverse Global South.
The ICC has expressed the business community’s willingness to work toward a "workable" mechanism. The keyword for industry is "workable"—a system that is simple, provides legal certainty, and does not create a bureaucratic burden that stifles research and development. The ICC argues that a well-designed mechanism could provide a significant and sustainable stream of funding for biodiversity conservation while ensuring that the "source of innovation" remains open for scientific advancement.
Reactions from Stakeholders and Policy Analysis
The ICC’s proactive stance has drawn a variety of reactions from other stakeholders at the conference. Environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have generally welcomed the business community’s recognition of nature loss as a material risk, though many remain cautious about the potential for "greenwashing." Advocacy groups are calling for the ICC’s proposed "nature metrics" to be rigorous and legally binding, rather than voluntary, to ensure genuine accountability.
Government delegates from developing nations have signaled that while they welcome private investment, the primary responsibility for funding still lies with developed nations who have historically benefited from biodiversity exploitation. The Armenian presidency of COP17 has emphasized its role as a bridge-builder, seeking to find "areas of convergence" between the profit-driven motives of the private sector and the conservation-driven mandates of the CBD.
From an analytical perspective, the ICC’s intervention represents a sophisticated shift in corporate lobbying. By positioning themselves as partners in implementation rather than obstacles to regulation, the 45 million companies represented by the ICC are attempting to shape the regulatory landscape in a way that favors early movers in the "green economy." The focus on "market integrity" and "de-risking" suggests that the private sector is ready to move, provided that governments take the lead in stabilizing the investment environment.
Implications for the Global Economy and the Path to 2030
The outcomes of COP17 will have far-reaching implications for the global economy. If the ICC’s calls for clear policy signals and financial de-risking are met, it could trigger a massive reallocation of capital toward nature-positive industries. This would likely accelerate the growth of sectors such as regenerative agriculture, sustainable forestry, and circular manufacturing. Conversely, a failure to provide the "practical outcomes" requested by the ICC could lead to a fragmented regulatory environment, where businesses face a patchwork of conflicting national rules, increasing the cost of compliance and slowing down global conservation efforts.
The ICC’s message is ultimately one of urgency. With only six years remaining to meet the 2030 targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the organization warns that there is no more time for "commitments" that lack a roadmap. The "nature-positive future" that the ICC envisions requires a level of collaboration between the public and private sectors that has rarely been seen in international diplomacy.
As the delegates in Armenia continue their deliberations, the ICC’s call for "convergence" serves as a reminder that the health of the planet’s ecosystems and the health of the global economy are inextricably linked. The success of COP17 will be measured not by the eloquence of its final declaration, but by the clarity of the instructions it provides to the millions of companies around the world that are waiting for the signal to act. By integrating nature into the core of economic policy and financial markets, COP17 has the potential to turn the tide against biodiversity loss and secure a sustainable foundation for future economic growth.
About the Author
