The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has issued a comprehensive policy call for a fundamental restructuring of the global trade governance framework, arguing that the current World Trade Organization (WTO) rulebook no longer reflects the complexities of the 21st-century economy. In its latest policy paper, "What next for plurilateral trade agreements?", the ICC emphasizes that the traditional multilateral approach, which requires full consensus among all 164 WTO members, is increasingly struggling to produce the agile and responsive regulations required by modern industry. As businesses grapple with a fragmented landscape of unilateral measures and divergent regulatory requirements, the ICC advocates for a more robust embrace of plurilateral agreements—deals signed by a subset of WTO members—as a pragmatic and essential pathway to maintaining the relevance of the global trading system.
The Growing Divergence Between Trade Law and Global Commerce
The global economy has undergone a radical transformation since the WTO was established in 1995. The rise of the digital economy, the integration of complex global value chains, and the rapid emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) have outpaced the slow-moving machinery of multilateral negotiations. According to the ICC, this "regulatory gap" has forced businesses to navigate a chaotic environment. Without updated global rules, individual nations are increasingly turning to unilateral trade measures, such as digital service taxes, carbon border adjustment mechanisms, and restrictive data localization laws.
This fragmentation raises the cost of doing business, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that lack the resources to comply with a myriad of conflicting national standards. The ICC notes that the lack of predictable and enforceable rules at the global level has led to "ad hoc workarounds" that offer temporary relief but do not provide the long-term legal certainty required for large-scale investment. The paper argues that for trade to remain an engine of growth, the rules must be as dynamic as the markets they govern.
The Historical Precedent and Modern Necessity of Plurilateralism
Plurilateral agreements are not a new concept within the international trading system. They have been a fixture of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the WTO throughout their history. Some of the most significant commercial achievements in trade history, such as the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) and the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), began as plurilateral initiatives. These agreements allow "coalitions of the willing" to advance trade liberalization in specific sectors without being blocked by members who are not yet ready or willing to participate.
The ICC asserts that plurilateralism is not a threat to the multilateral system but rather a necessary supplement to it. By allowing groups of countries to pioneer new rules in areas like digital trade, environmental goods, or investment facilitation, plurilateral agreements create a "living laboratory" for trade policy. Once these rules prove effective and gain broader support, they can eventually be integrated into the wider WTO framework. This approach avoids the paralysis often seen in the WTO’s Ministerial Conferences, where a single member can veto progress on issues that the vast majority of the membership supports.
A Chronology of WTO Rulemaking and the Shift Toward JSIs
To understand the current push for plurilateralism, it is necessary to examine the timeline of WTO negotiations and the gradual shift toward Joint Statement Initiatives (JSIs):
- 1995: The WTO is established, succeeding GATT. The system is built on the principle of a "single undertaking," meaning nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.
- 1996: The Information Technology Agreement (ITA) is concluded at the Singapore Ministerial. It serves as a landmark plurilateral success, eventually eliminating duties on hundreds of billions of dollars in tech trade.
- 2001: The Doha Development Agenda is launched. Intended to be a massive multilateral round, it eventually stalls due to irreconcilable differences between developed and developing nations.
- 2013: The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) is reached in Bali. It remains the only major multilateral agreement concluded since the WTO’s inception.
- 2017: At the Buenos Aires Ministerial (MC11), groups of members launch Joint Statement Initiatives (JSIs) on e-commerce, investment facilitation, and domestic regulation of services, signaling a decisive shift toward plurilateralism.
- 2024: The WTO concludes the Investment Facilitation for Development (IFD) agreement and makes significant progress on the E-commerce JSI, though legal challenges regarding their incorporation into the WTO treaty structure remain.
Supporting Data: The Economic Stakes of Trade Modernization
The drive for updated trade rules is supported by significant economic data. According to the WTO’s own estimates, the full implementation of the 2013 Trade Facilitation Agreement could reduce global trade costs by an average of 14.3% and boost global trade by up to $1 trillion per year. However, the ICC points out that these gains are at risk if the system does not move toward "TFA 2.0," which would digitize the remaining paper-based processes in global logistics.
Furthermore, the digital economy now accounts for a significant and growing share of global GDP. UNCTAD reports that global e-commerce sales reached nearly $27 trillion pre-pandemic, and digital services trade has grown at an average annual rate of 7% over the last decade. Despite this, there is no comprehensive multilateral agreement governing data flows or the use of AI in commerce. The ICC argues that a second-phase e-commerce agreement could unlock billions in additional value by harmonizing rules on electronic signatures, consumer protection, and cross-border data transfers.
Foundations for Success: Enforcement, Transparency, and Inclusion
The ICC policy paper emphasizes that the mere existence of an agreed-upon text is insufficient. For plurilateral agreements to deliver tangible value to the private sector, they must be built on five foundational pillars:
- Clear Implementation Pathways: Agreements must have defined timelines and technical roadmaps from the start to ensure that signatory nations actually put the rules into practice.
- Credible Enforcement: Without a mechanism to resolve disputes, trade rules are merely aspirational. The ICC calls for robust enforcement measures that give businesses confidence that their rights will be protected.
- Transparency and Review: Regular reviews are necessary to ensure rules remain relevant as technology evolves. Transparency ensures that all market participants, including those from non-signatory countries, understand the requirements.
- Openness to Participation: Plurilateral agreements should be "open-ended," allowing any WTO member to join at a later date once they meet the necessary criteria.
- Private-Sector Engagement: Since businesses are the primary users of trade rules, the ICC stresses that policymakers must engage with the private sector throughout the negotiation and implementation phases.
A significant portion of the ICC’s recommendations focuses on addressing the concerns of developing countries. Many nations in the Global South have expressed wariness toward plurilateralism, fearing it could lead to a "two-tier" WTO where they are left behind. The ICC recommends a proactive approach to this "digital divide" through meaningful technical assistance and capacity-building programs, ensuring that developing nations have the infrastructure and expertise to benefit from new trade rules.
Future Rulemaking: AI, Data, and the Digitalization of Trade
The ICC identifies three critical areas where future plurilateral rulemaking should focus to align with the needs of modern industry:
1. E-commerce Phase II: AI and Data Flows
While the current E-commerce JSI has made progress on issues like electronic signatures and "spam" prevention, the ICC calls for a more ambitious second phase. This would specifically address the role of Artificial Intelligence in commerce, establishing ethical and technical standards that prevent AI from becoming a new barrier to trade. Additionally, it would create high-standard rules for cross-border data flows, which are the lifeblood of modern services and manufacturing.
2. Expansion of the Information Technology Agreement (ITA)
The ITA has been one of the most successful trade deals in history, but its scope was last expanded in 2015. In the decade since, new categories of technology products—ranging from advanced semiconductors to green energy components and specialized medical devices—have emerged. The ICC advocates for an "ITA 3.0" to ensure that the latest innovations are not hampered by outdated tariff structures.
3. TFA 2.0: Digital Trade Documents
Building on the success of the 2013 Trade Facilitation Agreement, a "TFA 2.0" would focus on the complete digitalization of the trade ecosystem. This includes the widespread adoption of electronic bills of lading, digital certificates of origin, and automated customs procedures. Moving away from paper-based trade could significantly reduce the carbon footprint of global logistics while cutting administrative costs for businesses.
Broader Impact and Global Implications
The move toward a more plurilateral-heavy WTO has profound implications for the future of global governance. Critics argue that this shift undermines the principle of multilateralism and could lead to a fragmented "spaghetti bowl" of overlapping rules. However, the ICC and many trade economists argue that the alternative—continued stagnation—is far worse.
If the WTO cannot provide a forum for meaningful rulemaking, trade governance will increasingly move to regional and bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs). While FTAs like the CPTPP or USMCA are valuable, they lack the global scale of the WTO. By fostering plurilateral agreements within the WTO framework, the international community can maintain a centralized "clearinghouse" for trade rules, ensuring that they remain compatible with the core principles of non-discrimination and transparency.
The ICC’s policy paper serves as a call to action for trade ministers ahead of future high-level meetings. The message is clear: the global business community requires a trade system that is as innovative and interconnected as the companies it serves. Failure to modernize the WTO rulebook through practical, plurilateral initiatives risks relegating the organization to a role of historical bystander, while the real work of trade regulation happens elsewhere. For the global economy to thrive in an era of rapid technological change, trade policy must finally catch up with commercial reality.
About the Author
