For many employers, one of the richest and most efficient sources of new hires comes from referrals provided by their own workforce. Companies routinely tap into employees’ professional networks, leveraging existing relationships and internal knowledge to uncover qualified candidates for open roles. This strategy often yields candidates who are a better cultural fit, onboard faster, and have higher retention rates, making employee referral programs a cornerstone of modern talent acquisition. However, despite their undeniable benefits, these systems have also been identified as potential perpetuators of existing biases, particularly in industries where one gender is predominantly represented.
A groundbreaking new research study has uncovered a counterintuitive yet remarkably effective solution to a persistent challenge: the underrepresentation of women in hiring pipelines, especially in male-dominated industries. The study, detailed in the paper “Setting Higher Referral Targets Increases the Number of Women Recommended: Evidence From the Field and Lab,” demonstrates that simply asking employees to recommend more candidates can significantly increase the number of women put forward for jobs. Across multiple comprehensive studies, researchers found that doubling the referral target led to an increase of 17% to a staggering 88% in the number of women recommended.
This discovery highlights an easily overlooked but powerful lever that companies can pull to bring more women into hiring and promotion pipelines. Crucially, it represents a low-cost and remarkably easy-to-implement intervention, requiring no expensive overhaul of infrastructure or existing processes. The change is as simple as modifying a single number in a referral request, making it an accessible strategy for organizations of all sizes.
The research was spearheaded by University of Maryland professor and former Wharton PhD student Aneesh Rai, and co-authored by Wharton professor Katy Milkman, University of Chicago professor and former Wharton PhD student Erika Kirgios, and Cornell University professor Brian Lucas. Their findings, published in the esteemed Journal of Applied Psychology, offer a fresh perspective on tackling gender imbalance in the workforce, challenging conventional wisdom about the optimization of referral systems. As Professor Milkman aptly summarized, “A lot of employers are not thinking of this as a solution, while struggling to find talent.”
The Pervasive Challenge of Gender Imbalance in the Workforce
The issue of gender representation in the workforce, particularly in leadership and specialized technical roles, remains a critical concern across global industries. Despite decades of advocacy and concerted efforts towards diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), women continue to be underrepresented in executive suites, STEM fields, and other sectors traditionally dominated by men. For instance, according to a 2023 report by McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org, for every 100 men promoted from entry-level to manager, only 87 women are promoted, and only 82 women of color. This "broken rung" at the first step up to management has significant ripple effects throughout the entire career ladder.
In industries like technology, finance, and engineering, the disparity is even more pronounced. Data from the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) consistently shows women holding less than 30% of computing occupations, with an even smaller percentage in leadership and technical roles. Similarly, in financial services, while women make up a significant portion of the entry-level workforce, their representation plummets at senior levels. These imbalances are not merely ethical concerns; a wealth of research has demonstrated that diverse teams lead to better innovation, improved problem-solving, enhanced employee engagement, and superior financial performance. Companies with diverse leadership teams are significantly more likely to outperform their less diverse peers in profitability.
Employee referral programs, while highly effective for sourcing talent, can inadvertently exacerbate these existing gender gaps. Networks tend to be homophilous, meaning people often associate with others who are similar to themselves in termsographics, background, and professional experience. When employees primarily refer individuals from their existing networks, the hiring pipeline can become narrow and homogeneous, mirroring the existing composition of the workforce rather than diversifying it. This phenomenon means that in male-dominated fields, male employees are more likely to refer other men, thereby perpetuating the imbalance. Prior research, including surveys conducted by Rai and his team, suggests that managers often overlook simple interventions because they underestimate the power of a straightforward request, believing that existing incentives like cash rewards are already maximizing referrals. Milkman notes, "Most figure referrals are already being maximized, as there’s usually a cash reward. But people also need goals."
Unveiling the Power of a Simple Ask: Research Methodology and Key Findings
The researchers embarked on an ambitious series of six studies to rigorously test their hypothesis: two field experiments conducted in India and four online experiments carried out in the United States. This multi-pronged approach allowed them to assess the generalizability of their findings across different cultural contexts, industries, and candidate profiles.
One of the most compelling field experiments took place in India, involving nearly 6,000 real job applicants who were asked to refer candidates for surveyor positions at IDinsight, a global research and advisory firm. In this real-world scenario, a control group was asked to make a standard number of recommendations, while the experimental group was given a higher target. The results were striking: lifting the target from two recommendations to four boosted the number of women put forward to be surveyors by a significant 17%. The robustness of this finding was further validated in a second field test, involving an additional 1,300 job applicants, which replicated these results.
The online experiments in the U.S. further illuminated the phenomenon. Two of these studies involved participants imagining they were recommending candidates for CEO positions at a technology startup, a notoriously male-dominated leadership role. In these scenarios, increasing the referral target led to an even more dramatic increase in female recommendations, reaching an impressive 62%. The remaining two online studies asked participants to refer business leaders to speak with undergraduate students, again demonstrating a consistent pattern of increased female referrals with higher targets.
In each of these diverse experimental settings, the core methodology remained consistent: some participants were asked to make more referrals than others, allowing the researchers to directly test whether a larger target would boost the number of women who were recommended. The consistent and substantial increases, ranging from 17% to 88% depending on the context, underscore the profound impact of this simple, yet often overlooked, intervention. The findings suggest that the bottleneck in diversifying hiring pipelines may not be a scarcity of qualified women, but rather a flaw in how employees are prompted to search their networks for candidates.
Why Women Candidates Are Often Overlooked: Deconstructing the Bias
The research sheds light on a critical psychological mechanism that often leads to women being overlooked in referral processes, particularly within male-dominated sectors. Milkman and her co-authors discovered that when asked to recommend candidates, employees tend to name men first. This phenomenon is rooted in cognitive shortcuts and implicit biases. People often default to candidates who are most readily accessible in their minds, often those who align with existing stereotypes or are most similar to the current workforce. In environments where men are the majority, these initial, top-of-mind recommendations are more likely to be male.
“The first names tend to match our stereotype,” Milkman explained. This initial inclination can inadvertently create a self-fulfilling prophecy, limiting the pool of diverse candidates from the outset. However, the act of asking for extra candidates compels referrers to dig deeper into their networks, moving beyond their immediate, most obvious connections. This cognitive stretch forces individuals to broaden their search, pushing past initial biases and stereotypes to consider a wider array of candidates they might not have initially recalled. “But you see more diversity by asking for more names as people will be stretching beyond those stereotypes,” Milkman asserted. This process effectively surfaces qualified women who would otherwise remain overlooked, thereby creating more opportunities for women to be recommended and enter the hiring pipeline.
This mechanism highlights the power of behavioral nudges in overcoming unconscious biases. Rather than requiring extensive training or complex policy changes, a simple alteration in the request itself can prompt individuals to engage in a more inclusive search process. It leverages the inherent human tendency to meet a goal, redirecting that effort towards a more diverse outcome.
Addressing Concerns: Quality, Implementation, and Limitations
One of the natural concerns that arises with a strategy focused on increasing the quantity of referrals is whether it compromises candidate quality. The study carefully examined this aspect, and its findings offer reassurance: Milkman stated that there was "little evidence that asking for more referrals consistently lowered candidate quality." While the results were mixed, with some evidence of slightly weaker candidates in certain specific settings, this was not a consistent pattern across all experiments. This suggests that the broader pool of candidates generated by higher referral targets still largely comprises qualified individuals, simply a more diverse set of them. The benefit of increased diversity in the pipeline appears to outweigh any marginal, inconsistent dip in average perceived quality.
From an implementation standpoint, the intervention’s appeal lies in its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. As the authors point out, it "only modifies the number in a referral request and requires no expensive changes to infrastructure or existing processes." This makes it an incredibly attractive option for companies, particularly those with limited budgets for elaborate DEI initiatives. It can be integrated seamlessly into existing employee referral program structures, requiring minimal training or administrative overhead.
However, it is also important to acknowledge the study’s limitations. The research primarily tracked who was referred, not who was ultimately hired. While widening the top of the funnel is a crucial first step towards greater diversity, the study could not definitively conclude whether this broader pool translated into more women actually getting jobs. Milkman addressed this, explaining, “There was not enough data. The hiring rate was low. We would have needed a sample size 10 or 100 times larger to measure the impact on eventual hires, so we just couldn’t see the signal.” This highlights the need for further research to track the downstream effects on hiring outcomes and retention, although logically, an increased pool of qualified female candidates at the referral stage dramatically improves the chances of more women being hired.
Broader Implications and Expert Perspectives
The findings of this study carry significant implications for various stakeholders within the corporate landscape and the broader movement for workplace equality.
For Companies and HR Professionals: This research provides a powerful, actionable, and low-cost tool for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion goals. In an era where companies are increasingly pressured to demonstrate tangible progress on DEI, this intervention offers a clear path to expanding talent pools without substantial investment. Talent acquisition teams can easily integrate higher referral targets into their existing processes, potentially unlocking a wider array of candidates who might otherwise have been missed. HR leaders, often grappling with complex and costly DEI initiatives, might find this simple adjustment particularly appealing due to its ease of implementation and measurable impact. It challenges the assumption that referral programs are already optimized and encourages a re-evaluation of current practices.
For Women in the Workforce: The study offers a beacon of hope for increasing visibility and opportunity in pipelines where they have historically been underrepresented. By dismantling subtle biases at the initial stages of hiring, this strategy can create a more equitable playing field, allowing more qualified women to be considered for roles and promotions that might have previously remained out of reach. It underscores the idea that sometimes, the barriers to advancement are not a lack of capability, but a lack of opportunity to be seen.
For the Broader DEI Movement: This research contributes valuable empirical evidence to the growing body of knowledge on effective DEI interventions. It reinforces the idea that small, targeted behavioral nudges can yield significant results, complementing more extensive and systemic changes. It suggests that a comprehensive DEI strategy should not only focus on combating overt discrimination but also on addressing the subtle, often unconscious biases embedded in everyday processes. Experts in talent acquisition and behavioral economics suggest this study offers a compelling, yet often overlooked, strategy for organizations committed to building diverse teams. Dr. Maya Sharma, a prominent DEI consultant, stated, "This research brilliantly illustrates that sometimes the most impactful solutions are not the most complex. By simply reframing how we ask for referrals, we can unlock a hidden reservoir of talent and significantly move the needle on gender parity in hiring."
The study also aligns with broader trends in talent management that emphasize data-driven decision-making and the application of behavioral science principles to HR challenges. By demonstrating a clear causal link between a simple intervention and a desired DEI outcome, it provides a strong case for integrating behavioral insights into recruitment strategies.
Contextualizing DEI Efforts: A Complementary Approach
It is crucial to understand that increasing referral targets is not a standalone panacea for all diversity challenges. Rather, it serves as a powerful complementary strategy within a holistic diversity, equity, and inclusion framework. While it effectively broadens the candidate pipeline, its impact will be maximized when coupled with other proven DEI initiatives.
For instance, companies should continue to implement blind resume reviews, which remove identifying information to mitigate unconscious bias in initial screening. Diverse interview panels are essential to ensure that candidates are evaluated fairly by individuals with varied perspectives. Unconscious bias training, though sometimes debated in its effectiveness, can still play a role in raising awareness among hiring managers and employees about their own potential biases. Furthermore, fostering an inclusive company culture where diverse employees feel valued, supported, and have opportunities for growth is paramount for retention, ensuring that a broadened pipeline translates into sustained diversity within the organization.
The ultimate goal of any robust DEI strategy is to create a workplace where talent is recognized and nurtured regardless of gender, race, or background. This research offers a practical, immediate step towards that vision by making the initial gateway to opportunity more accessible and equitable.
Conclusion: Widening the Pipeline, Unlocking Hidden Talent
In an increasingly competitive global talent landscape, the ability to attract and retain diverse talent is not merely a matter of social responsibility but a strategic business imperative. The study led by Aneesh Rai and co-authored by Katy Milkman, Erika Kirgios, and Brian Lucas offers a compelling, evidence-based intervention that is both simple to implement and profoundly impactful. By merely adjusting the number of referrals requested, companies can significantly increase the representation of women in their hiring pipelines, particularly in industries where they have historically been underrepresented.
This research serves as a powerful reminder that sometimes, the most effective solutions to complex problems are found in simple, behavioral changes. It challenges organizations to look beyond conventional wisdom and to experiment with subtle nudges that can unlock substantial gains in diversity. As Professor Milkman aptly concluded, even in the presence of substantial financial incentives like "gigantic finder’s fees," the "simple step of asking me for four more referrals would make a big difference."
The message is clear: widening the pipeline of diverse talent can be as straightforward as asking people to look a little harder and stretch a little further within their networks. For companies striving to build more equitable, innovative, and high-performing teams, re-evaluating referral targets presents an unparalleled opportunity to make a tangible, immediate impact on gender diversity, paving the way for a more inclusive future of work.
About the Author
